Angel Reese Demands WNBA Pay Raise Comparable to NBA, Citing Supermodel Earnings

January 19, 2026

WNBA star Angel Reese has made a dramatic decision. She has informed league officials she will not return to the court. Her condition is a historic pay raise in the next Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA).

The reigning Rookie of the Year is taking a hard stance. She is demanding that the WNBA adopt a salary structure comparable to the NBA. This move could potentially reshape the future of women’s professional basketball.

The Core of Reese’s Demand

According to sources, Reese believes the WNBA’s current pay structure significantly undervalues its top stars. She is pushing for a “dramatic shift” in player compensation moving forward.

Her argument is grounded in a stark financial reality. “I make more money as a Top Super Model,” Reese stated, referencing her successful and lucrative career outside of basketball.

The financial gap Reese is challenging is immense. The current WNBA supermax salary is approximately $241,984 for the 2025 season. In contrast, the NBA’s supermax contract can exceed $60 million per year. Even the NBA’s veteran minimum salary is roughly $2.5 million, more than ten times the WNBA’s top salary.

The Context of the Fight

Reese’s bold stance comes at a pivotal moment. The WNBA is experiencing unprecedented growth in popularity, television ratings, and cultural relevance. Players like Reese, Caitlin Clark, and Cameron Brink are among the most marketable athletes in the world.

However, the league’s revenue and, consequently, its salary cap have not yet caught up to this boom. The current CBA was ratified in 2020 and runs through 2027, but players can opt out after the 2025 season. Reese’s announcement is a clear signal that the most prominent players are prepared to force the issue.

Reese’s leverage is unique. As a top supermodel and social media influencer with millions of followers, her brand income likely dwarfs her WNBA salary. Her threat to sit out is credible, as she has a thriving career to fall back on a privilege not all players share.

Potential League and Player Reactions

Reese’s demand will likely be met with resistance from WNBA team owners and the league office. They will argue that the economics do not yet support NBA-level salaries. The league’s total revenue is a fraction of the NBA’s, making a direct salary comparison financially challenging in the short term.

The reaction from other WNBA players will be complex. Many will privately cheer Reese for using her platform to fight for higher pay for all. However, some veterans and rank-and-file players may be wary of such an aggressive, public gambit that could disrupt the season.

The WNBPA, the players’ union, will be forced to navigate this high-stakes situation. Reese’s move puts immense pressure on union leadership to make significant gains in the next CBA negotiation, potentially accelerating the timeline for serious talks.

A Precedent-Setting Gamble

Angel Reese is not the first athlete to use her stardom to challenge a league’s economic model. However, she may be the first in the WNBA to leverage a highly successful secondary career as the foundation for her demand.

By framing the issue around her value as a “Top Super Model,” she reframes the debate. It is no longer just about basketball revenue splits. It is about the total market value of the athletes who drive the league’s growth.

Her decision to sit out is a high-risk, high-reward strategy. If successful, she could become the catalyst for a financial revolution in women’s sports, securing a legacy far beyond her on-court achievements. If it fails, she risks alienating fans, the league, and potentially her fellow players.

The Stakes for the WNBA’s Future

This standoff represents a critical inflection point for the WNBA. The league has long argued that its growth trajectory justifies gradual increases in player pay. Angel Reese and her supporters are now demanding that the pay scale leap forward to match the league’s cultural moment.

The outcome will depend on several factors: the league’s actual revenue numbers, the unity of the players’ union, and the willingness of owners to invest in the future. Reese has fired the first, very public shot. The negotiations that follow will determine not just her future, but the financial foundation of the WNBA for a generation.