The Case for Keeping LeBron
Ogwumike framed her argument by removing age from the equation entirely.
“If you remove his age and do a blind bio, a 6-8 point forward, averaging 22 points per game, six rebounds, seven assists, highest basketball IQ in the game that’s a great player.”
The numbers back her up. In his 23rd season, James is averaging 24.8 points, 7.8 rebounds, and 8.2 assists while shooting 41% from three career-best efficiency from deep.
The Fit Question
Ogwumike acknowledged that the Lakers’ offensive dynamic has shifted. Luka Dončić is now the primary engine. Austin Reaves has emerged as a legitimate third option. James’ role has necessarily evolved.
“The usage has shifted to Luka’s world and also to the future of Austin Reaves,” she noted. “But as another contemporary alongside those guys, you should absolutely want to keep LeBron.”
The Real Issue: Defense
Ogwumike argued that blaming James for the Lakers’ struggles misses the point. The team’s real weakness is on the defensive end an area that requires roster upgrades, not star subtraction.
“The Lakers’ biggest issue is their defense,” she said. The solution is adding better defenders and a dominant big man, not moving on from a player still producing at an elite level.
The Interest Elsewhere
James opted into his $52.6 million player option this season, his final guaranteed year with the Lakers. Interest from the Golden State Warriors, Cleveland Cavaliers, and Miami Heat has been reported.
Lakers GM Rob Pelinka hasn’t closed the door on a new deal but has reportedly signaled a preference for a discounted contract.
The Bottom Line
Ogwumike’s argument is simple: ignore the age, look at the production, and ask yourself if you’d want that player on your team.
“Should the Lakers want to bring him back? Absolutely. He’s a cheat code.”Sometimes the obvious answer is the right one.