THE MVP LADDER JUST DROPPED AND FANS ARE ABOUT TO START A FULL-SCALE WAR ONLINE JOKIC IS #1 BUT HE’S INJURED, LUKA’S FANS ARE SEETHING, AND WEMBY’S CLIMB IS THE MOST SHOCKING PART OF IT ALL

January 4, 2026

HOOK: THE RANKINGS THAT BROKE THE INTERNET

The official NBA MVP ladder just updated, and the entire internet is already holding emergency meetings in group chats, quote-tweeting in rage, and preparing their five-minute explainer videos.
The top five reads like a script designed to start maximum chaos: Nikola Jokic at #1, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander at #2, Luka Doncic at #3, Jalen Brunson at #4, and Victor Wembanyama crashing the party at #5.

But here’s the kicker that has everyone screaming into the void: Nikola Jokic, the man holding the top spot, isn’t even playing. He’s out for at least four weeks with a hyperextended knee.
The league dropped these rankings knowing full well the reigning frontrunner is in sweatpants, watching from the bench. It’s the ultimate troll job, and the fan reactions are pure, uncut drama.

This isn’t just a list. It’s a declaration of war. It’s the NBA handing a microphone to every fanbase and saying, “Go crazy.” The comments are flooding in faster than stats can be calculated: “Jokic at #1 while injured is DISRESPECTFUL to everyone else.”


How is Luka not ahead of SGA?!” “Wemby at FIVE? The league is scared of him already.” This is when fans start losing it online… and the league office is probably just sitting back, watching the engagement numbers explode. They know a controversial ranking sparks more debate than a boring, consensus one ever could.

THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: CAN AN INJURED STAR REALLY BE #1?

Let’s address the seven-foot Serbian elephant in the room first. Nikola Jokic getting the top spot while facing a month-long absence feels like a paradox. Before his knee buckled in Miami, he wasn’t just the MVP frontrunner; he was lapping the field.



The man was a walking history book: averaging a near 30-point triple-double, on pace to lead the league in rebounds and assists something no one has ever done. He had a triple-double in half of his games. The award was his to lose.

Then, the injury. A hyperextended knee. “Best-case scenario,” they called it, but “best-case” still means missing all of January. Now, the entire MVP conversation is hijacked by a rule: the 65-game minimum. To even qualify for the award, a player must hit that mark. Jokic’s window to get there is suddenly very tight.

The NBA’s official stance? He stays at #1 until he’s mathematically ineligible or someone performs a “pole vault” over his absurdly high bar.

But this is where the fan debate gets nuclear. One side argues it’s justice. *“The award is for Most Valuable Player *this season, and what he did for two months was so dominant, the throne is still his until someone takes it.”


The other side sees pure madness. “How can you be the ‘most valuable’ if you’re not on the court providing value? This just proves the media voted for him in December and are too stubborn to change it.” Even legends like Tracy McGrady are weighing in, calling it a “devastating blow” and a “sad day” for fans who pay to watch artistry like Jokic’s.

The league, by keeping him #1, has turned his injury into the central plotline of the entire MVP race. Every game he misses is a ticking clock, and every win by SGA, Luka, or Brunson is a potential coup.

The rankings that everyone will argue about this week aren’t about who’s playing best right now; they’re about whether past dominance should have a longer shelf life than current availability.

#2 vs. #3: THE BATTLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE NEW MVP

With Jokic’s throne suddenly looking less stable, the real-time battle for the crown is between two utterly different superstars: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Luka Doncic. This isn’t just a stats comparison; it’s a clash of styles, narratives, and fan energy.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (#2) is the serene assassin. He doesn’t just score 32 points a game; he does it with a chilling, efficient grace that feels inevitable. Shooting nearly 60% from the field for a month is video game stuff.
He rings in the New Year by dropping 30 points in three quarters, barely breaking a sweat. His case is built on ruthless, mistake-free elegance and leading the Thunder with a quiet dominance that analysts adore. He’s the candidate you respect.

Then there’s Luka Doncic (#3), the volcanic maestro. He’s leading the league in scoring at 33.5 per game and flirting with a season-long triple-double average. His argument isn’t built on efficiency; it’s built on sheer, overwhelming force of will.
He wraps up December by unloading 45-point triple-doubles and 43-point, 13-assist barrages like he’s playing a different sport. He’s doing something not even Kobe, Magic, or LeBron did in a Lakers uniform: averaging 30, 8, and 8.

His case is built on historic, breathtaking volume that makes fans leap off their couches. He’s the candidate you can’t look away from.

And the fanbases are at each other’s throats. SGA stans preach the gospel of winning and efficiency. “He’s the best player on a top team and doesn’t waste possessions!” Luka loyalists scream about unparalleled production and carrying a franchise’s hopes every single night.


“He’s putting up numbers we haven’t seen since Oscar Robertson! Put him on OKC and they’re champions!” The #2 and #3 ranking has lit the fuse. Every night one of them plays, it’s not just a game it’s an MVP audition meant to sway the narrative.

We’ve seen these debates explode before when stars feel snubbed, and Luka at #3, looking up at SGA, is a simmering pot about to boil over.

THE DARK HORSE AND THE ALIEN: BRUNSON AND WEMBY STIR THE POT

While the top three soak up the spotlight, the real intrigue and the hottest fan takes are brewing just below. Jalen Brunson at #4 is the ultimate “don’t forget about me” candidate. In an era of flashy stats, his argument is built on old-school, iron-clad leadership.


He handles the ball for the Knicks more than almost anyone in the league, yet in two recent games spanning 72 minutes, he committed only two turnovers. Let that sink in. He averaged 30 and 7 for December while shooting 40% from deep, piloting his team with the steadiness of a captain in a storm. He’s not the most athletic or the most viral, but he might be the most indispensable.

Fans of winning basketball are starting a quiet campaign: “If you value actually running a team to victory, it’s Brunson.”

Then, there’s the meteor that just crashed into the top five: Victor Wembanyama at #5. This isn’t a promotion; it’s a seismic event. The 7’4” phenom isn’t just playing well; he’s breaking the logic of the ladder itself.

He’s playing on a minutes restriction, often capped around 25 per game, yet his per-minute production is so absurd it’s forcing the league’s hand.

He’s literally averaging more points than minutes played recently. A 31-point, 13-rebound game in just 24 minutes isn’t a stat line; it’s a threat. The debate he sparks is philosophical: Can you be a top-5 MVP candidate if you’re not even playing starter’s minutes?

His mere presence here, over established All-Stars, screams that his potential is so terrifying, the league can no longer wait for him to be “unlocked” fully. Wemby at #5 isn’t a ranking; it’s a preview of the future, and it has everyone from analysts to casuals asking the same question: What happens when they let him off the leash?

THE SNUB LIST: WHERE’S THE RESPECT FOR ANT AND CADE?

A ranking isn’t truly controversial unless people feel violently left out. Enter the “Next 5” on the ladder, where the snub narratives are born. Anthony Edwards at #8 is the one that has social media warriors loading their memes. Here’s a young superstar carrying the Timberwolves, making highlight reels nightly, and embodying the swagger of the modern NBA… and he’s behind Jaylen Brown and just ahead of Tyrese Maxey?

For the online crowd, this feels like a crime. The “Where’s Ant?” tweets are already trending. His case is all about explosive, franchise-carrying momentum, and at #8, he’s positioned as the people’s champion against the establishment list.

And what about Cade Cunningham at #6, the one Wembanyama just barely nudged out of the top five? He’s having a career-defining season, resurrecting the Pistons and stuffing the stat sheet. Being this high is an honor, but being right at the door of the top five without getting the final push? That’s fuel. For fans of these players, the ladder isn’t a recognition; it’s a provocation.

It gives them a clear enemy (the media, the “narrative”) and a mission: to hype their guy louder. Every dunk from Edwards, every clutch shot from Cunningham, is now framed as a statement against the ladder itself. This is when chaos usually explodes… when elite players feel disrespected, and their fans adopt a siege mentality.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? THE ROAD TO TOTAL CHAOS

So, where does this go? Buckle up, because the next month is a reality TV show.

The Jokic Countdown: Every day is a ticking clock toward his return. Can the Nuggets stay afloat without him? If they stumble, the “out of sight, out of mind” pressure will crush his #1 spot. If they win, it becomes a weird argument for his value. His entire candidacy is frozen in time, waiting to be thawed.

The SGA vs. Luka Bloodsport: They play. We watch. We overreact. Every 40-point game from Luka will be met with a 30-point-on-12-shots masterpiece from SGA. The Thunder and Lakers records will be dissected like playoff tiebreakers. This head-to-head (even though they don’t share the court) is the main event.

The Wembanyama Experiment: The Spurs hold the wild card. If they increase his minutes and he starts putting up these insane numbers in 35 minutes a night, he won’t just be in the top five; he’ll launch into the top three conversation. He is the ultimate disruptor.

The Brunson Stealth Campaign: He’ll just keep winning, keep protecting the ball, and keep being underrated. The “Is Brunson actually the MVP?” think pieces are already being drafted. He’s the candidate that grows on you slowly, then all at once.

The Snub Rebellion: Edwards, Cunningham, and the others will use #8 and #6 as bulletin board material. Expect monstrous games followed by pointed post-game interviews. They are now playing for revenge against the list itself.

FINAL VERDICT: THE LADDER DID ITS JOB (IT GOT US FIGHTING)

The NBA’s MVP ladder isn’t a verdict. It’s the first paragraph of a story that we all get to write together for the next four months. By placing an injured Jokic at #1, they created a power vacuum.

By ranking SGA over Luka, they ignited a style war. By sliding Wemby into the top five, they announced a new era is knocking at the door. By putting Ant at #8, they gave him a villain to destroy.

The comment sections are the real arena now. The debates in group chats are the real analysis. This ladder succeeded because it wasn’t safe. It was volatile, debatable, and absolutely perfect for the drama-hungry, social-media-fueled world of the modern NBA fan. So, who’s really #1?

The answer doesn’t matter today. What matters is that you’re already scrolling, yelling at your screen, and hitting “post” on your take. The race is on, and everyone has a horse in this fight.